Apologetics

spring blossoms

David Hume v Miracles

David Hume (1711-1776) has been a celebrated skeptic since he put forth his argument against miracles. In this blog post, I plan on refuting it. Here is the argument in syllogistic form: Premise 1: Natural law is by definition a description of a regular occurrence. Premise 2: A miracle is by definition a rare occurrence.

David Hume v Miracles Read More »

Subscribe to Red Door Times

* indicates required




Scroll to Top